Subject: [FSS-d] Fw: Rueda de Prensa del 1º de Mayo del Precariado
(MayDaySur)NUESTRA SEÑORA DE LA PRECARIEDAD "ANUNCIA" LAS MOVILIZACIONES DEL
MAY DAY


>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <casadelapaz@...>
>> Amigos/as del Foro Social de Sevilla:
>> Estaría bien que los colectivos del Foro Social de Sevilla y personas en
>> nombre del Foro estuvieran en la Rueda de Prensa del MayDaySur, lo digo
>> porque van a estar los sindicatos, entidades y colectivos que apoyan y
>> uno
>> de ellos es el FSS. También estaría bien que las entidades que tuvieran
>> fax e internet mandara la convocatoria de prensa a través de sus medios.
>>
>> Aquí tenéis un aviso de las convocatoria realizado hoy para la prensa.
>> -----------------
>> 1º de Mayo del Precariado: Trabajos temporales, hipotecas permanentes.
>>
>> NUESTRA SEÑORA DE LA PRECARIEDAD "ANUNCIA" LAS MOVILIZACIONES DEL MAY DAY
>> EN SEVILLA
>>
>> El jueves 18 de abril, a las 11:00 horas, Nuestra Señora de la
>> Precariedad
>> se aparecerá en rueda de prensa para anunciarnos la buena nueva de las
>> acciones previstas para el próximo 1 de Mayo en Sevilla, con motivo de la
>> campaña Euro-MayDay Sur.
>> Sevilla, 25.04.05 / Euro-MayDay Sur
>>
>> Nuestra Señora de la Precariedad realizará un milagro en directo,
>> convirtiendo un contrato "por obra y servicio" en un contrato indefinido
>> "por obra y gracia" de su voluntad. La Hermandad del MayDay informará a
>> los asistentes de las acciones y los fines de la campaña. Además se
>> repartirán estampitas de la Nuestra Señora con la oración de los
>> precarios
>> /as.
>>
>> - Día/ Hora: Jueves 18 de Abril a las 11:00 horas.
>>
>> - Lugar: Puerta del Ayuntamiento, Plaza Nueva (Sevilla).
>>
>> - Interviene: Nuestra Señora de la Precariedad.
>>
>> - Asisten: Precarios /as.
>>
>> NOTA: No se garantiza a los reporteros
>> gráficos que la imagen de la Virgen pueda
>> ser captada por las cámaras.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ir a:
>> Nodo50
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lista de correo *de debate* del Foro Social de Sevilla.
> · Para suscribirte: <mailto:fss-d-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>
> · Para borrarte: <mailto:fss-d-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
> · Para subir archivos
> <http://es.groups.yahoo.com/group/fss-d/sfupld?path=/>.
> · Cómo usar la lista (FAQ):
> <http://es.groups.yahoo.com/group/fss-d/files/fss-d-faq>.
> · Web del FSS y agenda <http://www.forosocialsevilla.org/>
> Enlaces a Yahoo! Grupos
>
>
>    fss-d-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>    http://es.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html
>
>
>
>
>

Llegó finalmente a la prensa
carlos

ECUADOR
Crece la protesta: un muerto y 40 heridos en los choques
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2623

El Foro Andino de Lima se solidariza con pueblo ecuatoriano
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2617

PALESTINA
En ocasión del Día del Prisionero Palestino
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2616

Huelga de hambre de los presos palestinos
Fuente: www.fdlpalestina.org
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2612

El II Encuentro de Educacion Solidaria PALESTINA tierra de paz
tendrá lugar en la facultad de Psicologia, en Sevilla, durante los dias 3, 4 y 5
de Mayo.
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2607


CONVOCATORIAS
JORNADA No a la privatización del AGUA
Madrid 21 de abril de 2005
Sala 2.1 en CC.OO.-Madrid (c/ Lope de Vega, 36. Metro: Antón Martín o Sevilla)
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2605

Actos solidaridad con Colombia
Madrid 20 - 22 de abril
Red Europea de Hermandad y Solidaridad con Colombia (REDHER).
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2619

I Encuentro Estatal de Cooperación con Cuba
Sevilla, 20, 21 y 22 de mayo
Programa e inscripciones
http://www.tiempodecuba.34sp.com/encuentro/index.php?page=Participantes


VIAJES DE SOLIDARIDAD
Programa Viajes 2005
27 de abril Finalización plazo inscripción
http://www.sodepaz.org/viajes2005/index.html




BOLSA DE TRABAJO
Nuevas convocatorias
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=categories&op=newindex&catid=4

RESPONSABLE DE SOCIOS Y DONANTES CAritas

COORDINADOR NACIONAL DEL AREA DE FORMACIÓN Y EMPLEO CEAR

RESPONSABLE DE RELACIÓN CON INSTITUCIONES PRIVADAS Y CAPTACIÓN DE RECURSOS
CAritas

TÉCNICO COOPERANTE EN MAURITANIA  CAritas




---------------------------------------
SODEPAZ
Solidaridad para el Desarrollo y la Paz
www.sodepaz.org
www.sodepaz.net
Telefonos:
91 522 80 91
902 367 192 (si llamas de fuera de Madrid en más económico)
616 40 44 44 (si llamas desde un móvil es más económico)

------ Mensaje reenviado
De: José Luis de las Heras <castilla@...>
Responder a: <foro-SA@yahoogroups.com>
Fecha: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:09:03 +0200
Para: <castilla@...>
Asunto: [foro-SA] Salamanca y la devolución de los archivos a Cataluña


SALAMANCA Y LA DEVOLUCION DE LOS ARCHIVOS A CATALUÑA

     La noticia de que el gobierno ha elaborado un proyecto de ley para
devolver a Cataluña los archivos que ilegítimamente le incautó Franco ha
sido recibida por las autoridades salmantinas con rabia incontenida.

     En diversas ocasiones hemos publicado que en el mal llamado Archivo
de la Guerra Civil de Salamanca no hay documentación de la ciudad de
Salamanca ni tampoco de Castilla y León. Nada bueno ganamos los
salmantinos cuando en su momento Franco eligió nuestra ciudad para dar
albergue a instituciones represivas de su dictadura y nada perderemos
cuando se tomen medidas de reparación a favor de las víctimas del
franquismo.

     Aunque vivimos en Salamanca no podemos callar ante mentiras
publicadas diariamente aquí, que no pretenden otra cosa que manipular a
la opinión pública y generar odio contra Cataluña. Es falso que llevar
la documentación catalana al Archivo Nacional de Cataluña constituya un
atentado contra el patrimonio colectivo del Estado ¿Qué atentado es que
una documentación pase de un archivo público en Salamanca a otro archivo
público en Cataluña? ¿Es que el patrimonio histórico gestionado por la
Generalitat no es parte del patrimonio cultural del Estado?

     El patrimonio archivístico del Estado está organizado en un conjunto
de centros de ámbitos y naturalezas muy distintas, pese a lo cual
constituye una unidad esencial. Hoy por hoy los archivos catalanes son
una parte de ese conjunto y el Archivo Nacional de Cataluña es una
institución con plenas garantías para custodiar, conservar, organizar y
poner a disposición del público los fondos catalanes que va a recibir.

     Diariamente desde las páginas de la prensa de Salamanca se insulta
gravemente a los expertos que formaron parte de la comisión asesora
ministerial, sin guardar el debido respeto a sus brillantes currículums
y sin tener en cuenta que en algunos casos se trata de personalidades
intelectuales reconocidas internacionalmente. Lo cual es tan injusto
como inconveniente para quienes vivimos en la ciudad, porque proyecta
hacia afuera la idea de que la sinrazón gobierna aquí de manera absoluta.

     No se puede entender que el proyecto de ley presentado por el
gobierno en el parlamento va a favor de Cataluña y en contra de
Salamanca. Esta no es ya una historia de vencedores y vencidos. Cuando
el parlamento apruebe la ley no habrá más victoria que la de los amantes
de la libertad que habrán conseguido, después de 68 años, que se reponga
en sus derechos a quienes fueron expoliados de su patrimonio documental
por los militares sediciosos que se levantaron contra la II República.

     Desde estas líneas aprovechamos para pedir a los diputados
progresistas de Salamanca que voten a favor de esta ley porque
constituye un paso importante en el inicio de una política de
recuperación de la memoria histórica y favorece que nuestra ciudad se
convierta en sede de uno de los centros más importantes de información
sobre la represión franquista en todas sus etapas.


José Luis de las Heras
Profesor Titular de Historia Moderna
Universidad de Salamanca






Para cancelar su suscripción a este grupo, envíe un mensaje de correo-e a:
foro-SA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


Enlaces a Yahoo! Grupos


     foro-SA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

     http://es.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html





------ Fin del mensaje reenviado

Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
    From: Cort Greene <cort_greene@...>
Subject: Imperialist Intrigues in Mexico


In Defence of Marxism- http://www.marxist.com

Imperialist Intrigues in Mexico: No to the desafuero
of Obrador!
By Rob Lyon


The political situation in Mexico is heating up. The
anger of the
masses has been aroused by the political interference
of the United States
in the internal affairs of the country and that anger
is threatening to
boil over into an all out social explosion. The most
popular candidate
in all polls for next year's presidential election,
Andres Manuel Lopez
Obrador (AMLO), has not even officially announced his
intention to run
as PRD candidate for the presidency, and US
imperialism and Mexico's
ruling class are already trying to block him from
running for office.

Obrador, Mexico city's left wing mayor, has more than
once been
compared to Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez. He has
invested in large-scale
public works, funded and constructed new schools and
hospitals and has
fought for better social programmes in Mexico City,
including monthly
pensions for the elderly, the sick and disabled, and
for single mothers.
He would also like to see Mexico use its oil resources
to further fund
social programmes for the poor, something that the
Venezuelan
government has done successfully.

This is not the first time that Obrador's political
opponents have
attempted to block him from running for office. In
2000, Obrador moved from
Tabasco to Mexico City to run for mayor. His opponents
took him to
court and tried to have him removed from the ballot,
claiming that he was
not a resident of the capital city. He won the legal
battle and was
elected mayor and has governed under the slogan
"First, the poor". He
initiated new social programmes, has procured massive
domestic and foreign
investment into the city, and has attempted to
overhaul the
traditionally corrupt police force. Even before this,
in 1994, Obrador ran for
governor of Tabasco and lost to current PRI party
leader Roberto Madrazo in
what many say was a clear case of electoral fraud. In
the struggle that
followed, thousands of Obrador supporters occupied the
oil fields in
Tabasco. This struggle gave Obrador a lot of authority
and prestige as a
militant leader.

The Los Angeles Times recently quoted Jose Torres, a
retired bus driver
who now receives a $70 monthly pension thanks to one
of Obrador's
reforms, as saying, "He has bought new subway trains,
built high schools and
hospitals. He makes promises and keeps them, unlike
the president" (LA
Times, March 19, 2005). Obrador has captured the
imagination of
Mexico's poor, and the masses have come out in his
defence. The elderly,
workers, farmers, the unemployed and the urban poor
across the entire
country have seen what Obrador has done in Mexico City
and want to see the
same reforms on a national level. The Arizona Republic
reported a
demonstration today in Guadalajara:

" 'In the Federal District (Mexico City), the elderly
get free public
transportation, and we want that in Jalisco,' said
Jose de Jesus Medina,
84. A pensioner who takes home the meager peso
equivalent of $150 a
month, Medina would see his income jump almost 50
percent if he received
the same monthly stipend for food that Lopez Obrador
gives Mexico City's
over-70 crowd. 'Our salaries were always low, and when
we retire, we
end up panhandlers,' said Medina, who worked in a
flour mill for 35
years."

Already, one and a half years before Mexico's 2006
presidential
election, the Mexican masses have been politicised.
Mexico City is covered
with political posters in support of Obrador and all
across Mexico there
have been mass rallies in support of the mayor. The
Mexican ruling class
is getting worried: the masses have come out in
defence of Obrador.
Rank and file militants have formed committees in
support of Obrador and
rank and file committees of the PRD have been
established as well. These
committees have spread around the country, from cities
to villages and
universities and can already be counted in the
thousands. These action
committees demonstrate the creative will of the
working class to build
organs of struggle, similar to the Bolivarian Circles
in Venezuela.
Another important development in the situation is the
formation of the
"Workers Front against the desafuero (impeachment) of
AMLO", to which over
sixty unions have affiliated as well as many other
cooperatives and
  other community organizations. The struggle to defend
Obrador could
become the focal point for the expression of the
discontent across all of
Mexican society, and could unite the various groups in
struggle in to
one movement.

US Imperialism
Already in November of last year there was controversy
brewing over
Obrador's potential presidential candidacy. Then US
Secretary of State
Colin Powell, when asked about Obrador's possible
victory, was forced to
respond, "President Bush would receive a left-wing
Mexican leader as
warmly as he would receive any other leader of
Mexico".

The US delivered their stark warning to Mexico shortly
after Condoleeza
Rice took over as Secretary of State. She announced a
US travel
advisory warning for Mexico, claiming that Mexico was
seeing a rising wave of
crime caused by narco-traffickers. This was a clear
message to
President Fox's PAN and the PRI dominated congress -
the US would be much more
involved in the internal affairs of Mexico, and if
Mexico would not do
as it was told, then the war on drugs would be used to
remove
uncooperative officials. You see, it has recently been
revealed that one of the
PAN's presidential trip directors is an alleged drug
trafficker!
Mexican President Fox and his fellow lawmakers got the
hint, and began the
"desafuero" (the word for the legal process that has
been opened against
Obrador - the stripping of his immunity) against
Obrador - an obscure,
rarely used law to attempt to prevent Obrador from
running for
president.

In Mexico, elected officials have legal immunity - the
claim is that
this immunity is in place to protect elected officials
from trumped up
charges and constant legal proceedings. It is said to
protect them from
blackmail and bribery. The reality of the situation is
that it protects
the elected swindlers, crooks, and corrupt officials
in the Mexican
state from facing any legal charges for their
activities. It is now being
used by Mexican capitalism to prevent Obrador, a
potential threat to
the interests of capitalism and imperialism, from
running for office.

If an elected official is stripped of this immunity it
also means that
they cannot run for office - even if not convicted of
a crime. If
Obrador loses his immunity he can face criminal
charges and is not eligible
to run for president. This legal clause he been little
used in Mexican
politics. In fact, if used against Obrador it would be
the first time
in history. The LA Times reports that, "The mayor and
his Democratic
Revolutionary Party, or PRD, say the case is nothing
more than a political
maneuver to prevent him from running for president.
Constitutional
expert Lorenzo Cordova of Mexico's National Autonomous
University agreed.
Cordova said many judicial orders are issued every day
across Mexico and
that a significant proportion are ignored by public
officials without
prosecution. He said he knew of no previous case in
which a public
official had been prosecuted for ignoring a court
order. 'This would be a
first in Mexican history,' said Cordova, a former
advisor to the Federal
  Election Institute. 'This is a case of selective
justice and one that
is eminently political in its application.' (LA Times,
March 19, 2005).

And what is the reason for all of this? Obrador is
charged with
breaking a court order to cease construction on a road
to a newly constructed
hospital. The US and Mexican press, of course, state
that he is being
charged with problems in a "land dispute". The
hospital was supposed to
bring medical care to the shantytowns in the Santa Fe
area just outside
Mexico City and was financed with $44.5 million in
loans from the World
Bank and the InterAmerican Development Bank. The city
agreed to build
access roads to the new hospital.

The problems began when the city attempted to buy the
land needed to
build the access roads. The previous mayor of Mexico
City, Rosario
Robles, says that the owner of the land, Federico
Escobedo Garduno, who owns
a development company, wanted far too much money for
the land. "[...]
he wanted to sell it as if it were the price of Mexico
City," he told
the Kansas City Star (March 17, 2005). When no deal
was reached, the
city, under Robles, decided to seize the land because
it was for public
use. Escobedo took the case to court in order to stop
the seizure of his
land on December 4, 2000 - a day before Lopez Obrador
took office. He
claimed that the construction of the road was
preventing him from gaining
access to his property.

In March 2001, the court agreed with the landowner and
ordered that
construction stop. Obrador says that work was stopped
that day and he is
backed by the real estate and construction agency
involved in the work,
which says that it received the order to halt
construction on the same
day the court issued its order. According to Escobedo
the city did not
remove the construction equipment immediately, and in
August 2001,
Escobedo filed a formal complaint saying he still was
unable to access his
land. The Attorney General, appointed by Fox, then
opened a formal
investigation in November of that year. The desafuero
of Obrador is due to
the fact that he "ignored" a court order - which is
clearly not the
case. He is not charged with corruption, embezzling,
or any other form of
personal enrichment.

Obrador and his supporters say that such high level
involvement in what
is really a minor legal case, indicates that there is
a conspiracy to
prevent him from becoming the next president of
Mexico. It must also be
said that the leading presidential candidates of both
the PAN and the
PRI are longtime rivals of Lopez Obrador, he lost the
Tabasco governor
elections to PRI leader Madrazo in 1994 and defeated
the PAN's most
likely candidate for president when the two ran in the
Mexico City's
mayoral elections in 2000.

This is clearly an intrigue on the part of Mexican
capitalism and US
imperialism, and polls show that 70% of Mexicans agree
that the case is
politically motivated. Recent polls show that 80% of
Mexicans are
opposed to the desafuero. With the level of corruption
and scandals that
involve Mexican officials, any number of elected
officials should lose
their immunity, be removed from office and face legal
charges for things
much, much worse than building a road to a hospital.
The case they are
bringing against Obrador does not even hold. The
workers and farmers are
not stupid, and have seen right through this little
manoeuvre and legal
dirty trick and are determined to resist the forces of
imperialism. The
US is playing with fire, and if Obrador is blocked,
they could face a
revolutionary explosion of the Mexican masses. If the
plan to remove
Obrador from the presidential race succeeds, the 2006
election will lose
all legitimacy, and many in Mexico are saying that
this will lead to
  massive civil resistance and disobedience, including
blockades of
highways and cross-border trade. Mexico could possibly
see events similar
to those that have taken place in recent years in
Bolivia. This will in
turn lead to further political crisis and put the
Mexican revolution on
the order of the day.


Obrador has already mobilized for his defence. The
decision on his case
will be announced by a four-member committee of the
lower House of
Deputies this Wednesday. Demonstrations in defence of
Obrador are being
organized up and down the country which will go ahead
no matter the
ruling.

As we have explained, there is not a single stable
bourgeois regime
from the Tierra del Fuego to the Rio Grande. A
revolutionary wave is
rolling across Latin America and threatens to engulf
the entire region. We
have not seen the social explosion in Mexico that we
have seen in
countries like Bolivia and Venezuela. That is not to
say that there has been
nothing happening in Mexico. There have been recent
student and strike
movements as well as local and state electoral
victories of the PRD,
but in general the movement has been an undercurrent,
slowly building
pressure.

The election of rightwing Vincente Fox and the defeat
of the PRI after
seventy years of rule seemed to let some of the steam
off, but was no
solution for the Mexican workers and peasants. The
masses looked to the
new era under Vincente Fox in the hopes that their
problems would be
solved. The Fox government has not been able to solve
one of the problems
facing the Mexican masses. The policies of the Fox
government are
simply a carbon copy of the old PRI policies. In fact,
things have gotten
worse, especially with the downturn of 2000 and the
workers, farmers and
poor are now increasingly looking to Obrador for away
out of the
miseries of capitalism. The Fox regime is seen by the
imperialists as a weak
regime that has not been able to introduce its
policies. Mass
mobilizations of the working class have defeated
imperialist policies at every
turn - the privatization of oil, the privatization of
electricity, and
the reform of the labour code have all been defeated
by the mobilization
of
  the working class and the farmers.

Of course, it must said that the policies of Obrador
are moderate. For
instance there is long standing resentment by workers
employed in the
Federal District about the fact that 100,000 of them
are still on casual
contracts, and most of them without social security
rights. However, it
must also be admitted that after 10 years (or more) of
unrelenting
attacks on the workers and poor of Mexico and the
unrelenting suffering of
the masses for decades, the policies of Obrador are
like a "a glass of
fresh water in the middle of the desert" and have
opened the floodgates
to the expression of years of pent up frustration and
discontent.

Splits at the top
The scandal has spilled over into the US, where there
are daily
articles about the situation - and Obrador has been
giving stark warnings from
the mouthpieces of US imperialism. There are repeated
reports that
although he is a populist and speaks like a radical,
if elected, Obrador
would be reasonable and responsible and fall in line
with the interests
of US imperialism and Mexican capitalism. At the end
of February, the
Miami Herald ran an article entitled Despite his talk,
a President López
Obrador would be pragmatic (February 26, 2005). A
Herald journalist
asked the following question to four experts on the
Mexican economy:

Question: Mexico City Mayor Andres Manuel López
Obrador, the favorite
in the run-up to Mexico's 2006 presidential race, said
he would
restructure the country's debt. Should investors be
alarmed by this statement?

What were the answers of our experts (only three were
really
interesting from our point of view)?

"José Angel Gurria, a former Mexican minister of
finance and a former
minister of foreign affairs said: "Economics is not
Mr. López Obrador's
strong suit [...] The challenges today are much more
complex:
international competitiveness, sustainable growth, job
creation, a predictable
and modern legal framework to attract foreign
investment, etc. Talking
about restructuring Mexico's foreign debt shows an
obsolete, dated,
uninformed discourse, as is unfortunately so often the
case with Mexico's
left.

"Armand Peschard-Sverdrup, director of the Mexico
Project at the Center
for Strategic and International Studies answered:
López Obrador's
recent remarks about restructuring the debt are
unsettling because such
remarks might scare away the very lenders he will have
to turn to should he
win in 2006. Should López Obrador succeed in capturing
the presidency,
he would be tempered by a series of realities,
including a divided
Congress, in all likelihood; an autonomous central
bank; an autonomous
Supreme Court; the interests of Mexico's private
sector; a highly
integrated relationship with both the United States
and Canada; and the
increasingly urgent need for structural reforms.

"Rafael Fernandez de Castro, dean of the Department of
International
Studies at Instítuto Tecnológico Autónomo de Mexico
and editor of Foreign
Affairs en Español replied: The most likely scenario
in terms of the
economic policy that a possible Lopez Obrador
administration would follow
in 2006 will be one characterized by populist rhetoric
but pragmatic
and reformist in reality. The reason is that the
middle class and the
business class play a very important role in political
alliances and in
Lopez Obrador's bases of support."

The Mexican ruling class and US imperialism are not
sure what to do
about Obrador. In fact the PRI is split on the issue,
and reveals the
panicky indecision on the part of the ruling class.
The Financial times
published an article on March 28 under the caption
Attempt to impeach
Mexico City Mayor splits PRI. The article reports that
the PRI is split
down the middle on what do in this case. The article
quotes the party's
congressional spokesman who said, "The upcoming vote
has split the party
in two. Both sides feel very strongly on this matter
and it's becoming
a very delicate issue within party circles".

The PRI is still the largest congressional party.
Fox's PAN obviously
supports the desafuero, while the PRD is opposed. The
PRI holds the
balance - not only in the lower house, but on the
four-member committee as
well. The PAN and the PRD have one member each on the
committee, for
and against the desafuero respectively. The PRI holds
the other two
positions. Because of a quirk in the rules, if the
committee is split
two-two on the issue, the desafuero will end. If it
votes three-one against,
the full house has the right to overrule the decision.
With tensions
running high, and pressure building on the PRI, there
is speculation that
the two PRI members will split their votes and let the
desafuero die.
If they both vote together in favour or against, this
will put massive
pressure on the party, making the dispute more acute,
provoking a
serious battle in the party and possibly a split.

This split in the traditional party of the Mexican
ruling class reveals
the split in the ruling class itself. The PRI has
entered a crisis, and
this reflects the crisis of Mexican capitalism. One
section, the one
quoted above, thinks that Obrador, if he were to
become president, can be
bought off and that he will toe the line in the
interests of
capitalism, similar to Lula in Brazil. The other
section of the ruling class is
getting panicky, and worry that Obrador could end up
another Hugo
Chavez. And Obrador would immediately be faced with
this choice - facing a
credit or investment strike, he could stand up to
imperialism like
Chavez, or give in like Lula. The Chicago Sun-Times
published an AP article
on March 27 by Mark Stevenson revealing the attitude
of the section of
the bourgeois that do not want to risk an Obrador
presidency, which just
days before a decision on his desafuero have come out
strongly against
him - a warning to the PRI that it to had best solve
its problems, and
  get rid of him.

"Political, church and business elite are expressing
concerns that
Latin America's rising tide of charismatic leftists
may soon sweep into
Mexico. The warnings are clearly aimed at Mexico
City's free-spending
mayor, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who leads the
polls for the 2006
presidential race."


Lopez Obrador
The article reports that Vincente Fox has joined the
fray gone on the
offensive against Obrador, trying to scaremonger the
middle class into
opposing Obrador: " 'Here come the messiahs who offer
the Earth and the
sky . . . populists with magic recipes for
everything,'' President
Vicente Fox said recently. 'In the end, they are only
cheating people and
taking money away from hardworking people.' "

The article explains that the "Fox administration
officials say the
mayor lacks respect for the law and could return
Mexico to the instability
and inflation of the 1980s. The mayor has increased
the city's debt,
and he sometimes appears to challenge court and
legislative decisions
with street protests swelled by city employees and
pensioners."

Sounding like the arguments used against Chavez in
Venezuela, although
in a milder form, the article explains that, "The
open-checkbook
policies and relentless personal promotion of the
mayor disturb many in a
region all too familiar with ''caudillos'' --
political bosses who used
charisma, graft and handouts to stay in power." We
have heard this before
- anyone who supports the poor and offers genuine
reforms is using
"handouts" to buy off the poor. Obrador is compared to
a "caudillo" as
Chavez is called a strong man, a dictator. This line
of arguing is followed
up in the article by a quote from U.S. Ambassador Tony
Garza who in
August of last year said "People can lose faith in
their public
institutions, turning away from both markets and
democracy and toward the sort of
demagoguery that has too often plagued other
countries". This is a
clear attempt to link the possibility of an Obrador
presidency with the
situation in Venezuela, and shows that the US
genuinely fears that the
  Mexican workers and farmers may lose faith in "both
markets and
democracy", i.e. capitalism and imperialism, and
possibly move towards
socialism. It is also a warning that if Obrador is
elected president, that
his government would be lumped in with others
considered "hostile" to the
US - i.e. Venezuela and Cuba, where the US has been
interfering for
years, organizing economic sabotage and coup d'états.

The article ends by showing the unity of the church,
the state and the
bourgeois on all matters of this type. "Carlos Slim,
Latin America's
richest man, has supported Lopez Obrador's urban
renewal and anti-crime
programs, but he warned recently that 'a nostalgia for
populism could
develop, one that could affect all the progress toward
democracy we've
made in the 1980s and '90s.'" As in Venezuela, where
the oligarchy and
the church, and all the reactionary elements of
society joined forces
against Chavez, so they are now doing the same in
Mexico against Obrador.

The head of Mexico's Employers Federation, Alberto
Nunez, called for
''a head-on battle against populism, 'and even
Cardinal Norberto Rivera
weighed in, saying ''there is no room for a populist
government.'"

This is a clear warning to Obrador that a section of
the ruling class
is ready to fight. And what does Obrador have to say
in reply? ''the
little that is given to the poor, they always call
that populism or
paternalism, and the large amounts handed out to the
rich, that's development
and bailout programs. That's an old trick''.

The article also says that supporters of Obrador say
that the left will
become radicalized if he is barred from office. This
is undoubtedly
true, as is evidenced by a poll last October where
half of the people
interviewed said there would be ''serious political
problems'' if Obrador
were barred from running. It would seem obvious that
the left would
radicalize in support of Obrador, but the bourgeois
press cannot allow this
to seem like a positive development! The article then
quotes novelist
Carlos Fuentes who brings up the prospect of a
guerrilla war by saying
''If figures on the left are marginalized, like
they're doing to Lopez
Obrador, there is a risk that the left . . . will go
back into the
hills,'' which the journalist then adds to by saying
"referring to the
region's tradition of rural guerrilla movements."

Whether it was intended by Fuentes or not, who has
been a stern critic
of US imperialism in the past, his words are being
used as a scare
tactic. Whether he intends to scare the left or the
right, he intends to
terrify people with the prospect of a guerrilla war. A
revolutionary
movement of the workers and farmers in Mexico,
organized in its action
committees on a national scale, would have to adopt
the methods of the
anti-imperialist struggle similar to the movement that
has developed in
Venezuela and Bolivia where the movement is not a
guerrilla struggle
taking place in the countryside but is a movement of
the workers and urban
poor, the overwhelmingly dominant force in Latin
American society today,
who are leading the countryside in struggle through a
mass
revolutionary movement.

Forward with the Mexican Revolution!
All of this talk in the bourgeois press about what
Obrador would do if
he becomes president, is at this point in time, almost
irrelevant. If
he survives the desafuero and is able to run for
president and wins, and
he sticks to his word, he could potentially play a
role similar to that
of Chavez in Venezuela, because the social and
economic conditions of
the two countries are similar. This is what the
Mexican bourgeois and US
imperialism fear above all else- that Obrador will
bring the
revolutionary tide that is sweeping Latin America
right to the very borders of
the United States. The US is desperate to stem the
shift to the left that
is taking place in Latin America. On the other hand,
if Obrador does
win the presidency but he doesn't stick to his word,
he will arouse the
anger of the masses that he mobilized in his defence.
They will demand
that he deliver on his promises, and if he refuses,
they will look for
someone who can and will. The struggle will continue,
and develop, and
  this will be reflected in the PRD itself, which is
now becoming a mass
pole of attraction for radicalizing youth and workers.


The recent imperialist intrigues in Mexico could be
the spark that
lights the flames of the Mexican revolution. The
revolutionary wave that is
sweeping Latin America now threatens to land right at
the doorstep of
the United States of America. Possibly more than any
other revolutionary
movement in South America, it is the Mexican
revolution that could
alight a social explosion in the US itself, and the US
ruling class is
aware of this. The US fears what the consequences of a
Venezuela type
process and movement in Mexico might mean in the US.
Such a movement - a
mass, democratic, anti-imperialist movement with all
the potential in the
world to develop into an anti-capitalist, socialist
movement - would
have an enormous effect on the downtrodden and
oppressed in the United
States, millions of which, by the way, are from Mexico
or are of Mexican
origin. Beyond the millions of Mexicans or
Mexican-Americans, there are
millions of Latin Americans in the US, and as the tide
of revolution
  continues to roll across the continent to the very
borders of the US,
this must inevitably at some stage find a reflection
in the US itself.
Is there any wonder what the impetus was behind the
renewed push
announced last week by Bush and Fox, after years of
talk and no action, to
solve the question of immigration and border control?
As with the
desafuero, none of these legal tricks will be able to
stop the movement of the
masses once it is activated.

More than any other Latin American country, Mexico is
considered the
backyard of the US. Through the vehicle of NAFTA, the
US has been able to
strengthen its stranglehold over Mexico. Smaller and
weaker Mexican
centres of production have been bought up and replaced
with powerful US
multinationals and conglomerates, and the Mexican
masses face
deteriorating social conditions, attacks on wages, and
an increase in prices. The
Mexican workers and farmers are now looking for a way
out of the
miseries of capitalism, but imperialism cannot afford
or allow even the minor
reforms that have been initiated by Obrador.

US imperialism cannot afford to lose control of the
situation in Mexico
as it has in Venezuela and Bolivia. The US
administration has learned
from the past, but this will not help them. When Hugo
Chavez was elected
President of Venezuela in 1998, US imperialism and the
Venezuelan
oligarchy thought that he would be like any other
politician - he could use
his populist phraseology and rhetoric, but in the end
he would succumb
to the pressures of capitalism and imperialism and toe
the line. One
section believes that this will be the case with
Obrador. But the US
administration seems determined not to risk this
happening again, and they
are trying at all costs to stop the revolutionary tide
from sweeping
Mexico - hence they are hell bent on stopping Obrador
from running for
the presidency.

The forces of imperialism and capitalism were very
wrong about Chavez,
and will not take the chance anywhere else. Chavez
could not be bought
and his election was the expression of the mass
anti-imperialist
sentiments of the Venezuelan masses. Knowing this, the
US will not allow
something similar to take place in Mexico. That is why
the US is trying to
block Obrador as a presidential candidate. But no
matter what the US
does, it will be wrong and only further stoke the
fiery anger of the
masses. If the US relents and allows Obrador to run as
president, they are
faced with a potential mass anti-imperialist movement,
led by a popular
president, which would threaten all of their
interests, i.e. a
situation similar to that in Venezuela, where
President Chavez has now come out
in favour of socialism as the way forward for the
revolution. Beyond
this, a movement of this type in Mexico will
strengthen the shift to the
left and revolutionary movements across Latin America,
strengthen the
  movement in Venezuela, and find an echo in the United
States. However,
if they attempt to block Obrador as a presidential
candidate, the
masses, who are already fully aware of the intrigues
of the US, will take to
the streets in the defence of the political
sovereignty of the country,
in the defence of a popular mayor of Mexico City who
is perceived as
being dedicated to the poor, and against imperialism.
This could even
force the US and Mexican ruling class to reverse the
decision, and allow
him to run for president. This would mean that he
would then have the
support of an even more radicalized mass movement. As
Marx once famously
wrote the revolution needs the whip of the
counter-revolution - this is
undoubtedly true. The whip of the counter-revolution
in Mexico could
very quickly lead to a revolutionary situation - which
would of course
threaten all of the interests of imperialism and
become a pole of
attraction for all the oppressed of the world. Either
way, no matter what they
  decide, Mexican capitalism and US imperialism are
facing an
anti-imperialist, democratic mass movement.

No matter the outcome, the Mexican workers and poor
can only rely on
themselves and their own organizations. They must link
the struggle in
support of Obrador with the struggle against
imperialism and capitalism,
they must take this fight into their trade unions and
the PRD. The
action committees in defence of Obrador and the PRD
action committees that
have spontaneously sprung up around the country,
demonstrate the
creative genius of the working class. These organs of
struggle must be
extended around the entire country and linked up on a
national level in order
to coordinate the struggle nationally. When the
Mexican workers and
peasants organize and move in a decisive way, with the
Latin American
workers and peasants behind them, no force on earth
will be able to stop
them.

March 28, 2005

Update, April 4, 2005: If there is an impeachment,
there will be a
revolution!
The above article was written last Monday, March 28.
Since then, events
have been moving fast. The four-member Congressional
committee decided
last Wednesday, March 30, to delay the decision on the
ruling until
Friday, April 1. Clearly, the PRI, the PAN and the
ruling class were
concerned about the reaction of the masses. Mass
rallies had been planned
for the day, regardless of the decision. There was
some concern on the
part of the ruling class that if the decision to go
ahead with the
desafuero was made, that there would be mass
demonstrations across the
country - and no one was sure where this would lead.
With the mass opposition
to the desafuero, there is concern on the part of all
political parties
and the ruling class that Mexico could see similar
events to those in
Venezuela with mass demonstrations and the development
of a mass
revolutionary movement, and there has been talk of the
setting up of road
blockades and barricades on the part of the masses.
Even the PRD leaders,
  clearly worried about and fearful of the consequences
of mass
demonstrations, and worried that things "could get out
of hand" and that they
would lose control of the situation, called off the
demonstrations for
Wednesday. The delay in the ruling and the lack of
lead given by the
heads of the PRD cut across the mood of the masses.

There was speculation in the lead-up to the ruling
that the two PRI
members of the four-man committee would split their
vote and effectively
kill the desafuero process. However the pressure of
the ruling class was
far too great on the PRI, and on Friday, April 1, the
four-member
committee voted 3-1 (the PAN and PRI members voted in
favour and the PRD
member voted against) to continue with the desafuero
process. There have
been rumours that the change of direction of the PRI
was a result of a
secret agreement between the government of Vincente
Fox and the PRI. The
announcement was made on Saturday, where the 3 members
in favour of the
process recommended that the mayor stand trial based
on charges that he
ignored a court order to stop construction on a road
to a local
hospital.

The decision of the congressional committee now refers
the process to
Congress itself, which will vote on Thursday whether
to continue with
the impeachment or not. Obrador will be called to the
Chamber of Deputies
to argue his case before the vote. As explained in the
article above,
if Congress votes to continue with the process, his
political immunity
from prosecution would be removed, he would be barred
from running for
office, and would also be removed from office, which
would mean that the
Senate would then appoint a replacement mayor of
Mexico City.

Although the PRD leadership did not call for mass
demonstrations
against the ruling, and in spite of the lack of
information and confusion,
and despite the fact that the decision was not
announced until the
following day (in order to prevent the anger of the
masses from spilling over
into mass demonstrations) there were spontaneous mass
demonstrations
against the ruling on Friday. Thousands and thousands
of people streamed
into the Zocalo main square in front of congress. In
spite of the timid
lead given by the PRD, who were vainly hoping that the
PRI would split
the vote, the masses have shown the lead, and shown a
clear willingness
to fight to defend democracy, and to defend a
potential president who
promises to bring them change.

The PRD leaders clearly fear a mass movement, and
obviously fear the
development of a mass revolutionary movement. Obrador
has called for a
mass demonstration in his defence in the main square
in front of the
Congress on Thursday April 7. He wants to explain to
the masses his plan
for continued mass civil disobedience. Although he,
like the PRD, has
been calling for calm and peace, and has been asking
that no roadblocks or
anything else too radical be done in his defence, he
also said that any
violence that does occur will be the fault of the
government, as has
always been the case. The ruling of the congressional
committee, the
behaviour of the PRD leaders, and the action of masses
tell us a few
things: the necessity of democracy in the PRD, that
the masses must continue
to form action committees in defence of Obrador, and
that the struggle
of these committees to defend Obrador must be linked
to the general
struggle to improve the conditions of life, i.e. that
they must struggle
  against capitalism and imperialism. We can also see
that it is
necessary to mobilize a showing of force of the
working class, explaining that
it is not enough to vote and necessary to fight. The
PRD must be
rescued as a fighting force - the PRD and the unions
must call a 24-hour
general strike to overthrow Fox. The possibility of
calling this strike
will depend on the unity of the action of the PRD, the
action committees,
and the unions. The unions, the PRD and the masses
must take up the
slogan "If there is an impeachment, there will be a
revolution!" which was
shouted by thousands of people at the Zocalo on
Friday.

Great events are being prepared in Mexico. The tide of
the Latin
American revolution is rolling across the entire
continent, and is crashing
against the very borders of the United States. The PRD
has before it the
historic opportunity of transforming the situation and
of shifting the
correlation of forces decidedly in favour of the
working class. The
PRD, on the basis of a genuine socialist programme,
could mobilize the
masses and call for the overthrow of Fox and bring
true democracy and
socialism to Mexico. The action committees that have
sprung up across
Mexico must be extended across the entire country and
in the factories and
places of work. They must be linked up locally,
regionally and
nationally to coordinate the struggle to improve the
conditions of work and
life, and to struggle for the transformation of
society!

Against the impeachment, overthrow Fox!

If there is an impeachment, there will be a revolution!



______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡250 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es

[Español, English (Raw), Français (d'Ordinateur)]

¡NO AL DESAFUERO DE ANDRÉS MANUEL LÓPEZ OBRADOR!

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

MANIFIESTO LADOISTA:

A los ciudadan@s de la Ciudad de México,
Al pueblo de México,
A los pueblos y gobiernos del Mundo:

Quien desobedece una ley injusta, en realidad no hace
sino obedecer a un principio superior de la Verdad.
Gandhi.


El desafuero del alcalde mexicano Andrés Manuel López
Obrador es un golpe de estado contra el Gobierno del
Distrito Federal (Ciudad de México), contra las
instituciones democráticas de la República Mexicana,
contra los derechos políticos de tod@s l@s ciudadan@s
del país y contra las luchas históricas del pueblo de
México y sus victorias en la conquista del sufragio
efectivo, la soberanía y la autodeterminación.

El desafuero de López Obrador es una acción
totalitaria, diseñada por la escoria de la política
nacional, para imponer una dictadura bipartidista en
beneficio del PRI y del PAN, y sobre todo para
preservar la impunidad de la pandilla de delincuentes
-Salinas, Fernández de Cevallos, Madrazo y ahora la
"pareja presidencial" y sus compinches-- que durante
más de 20 años han mantenido a México hundido en la
miseria, la amargura y la desesperanza.

Somos demócratas y estamos dispuestos de antemano a
aceptar la derrota electoral de López Obrador, si éste
no obtiene limpiamente la mayoría en las urnas. Pero
su desafuero, el derrocamiento del gobierno capitalino
y la destrucción de los derechos electorales de los
mexicanos, tendrán gravísimas consecuencias que deben
ser conocidas por todos los ciudadanos de la
República, a quienes, después de examinar estas ideas,
invitamos a asumir una postura serena pero firme e
indeclinable al respecto.

Sí, porque tras el desafuero y el inmediato
encarcelamiento de López Obrador, a quien ya le tienen
preparada una celda de exterminio en un penal de alta
seguridad, donde lo secuestrarán acusándolo de nuevos
"delitos" que ya le ha fabricado Rafael Macedo de la
Concha, las elecciones presidenciales y legislativas
de 2006 perderán toda validez jurídica, el sucesor de
Fox será un "presidente" espurio, sin autoridad
ninguna, excepto la que se arrogue mediante el uso de
la fuerza bruta, y el Congreso de la Unión carecerá
igualmente de representatividad legal.

En estas condiciones, el salinismo logrará su meta
final y suprema: privatizar Petróleos Mexicanos y la
Comisión Federal de Electricidad, empresas
estratégicas sin las cuales México dejará de ser
económicamente viable. Ante esta oscura y trágica
perspectiva, al dejarnos sin instituciones legítimas
para procesar la transmisión del poder, el presidente
Vicente Fox y sus cómplices están abriendo las puertas
de la guerra civil y, porque amamos a nuestro país y
sabemos que su futuro puede ser muy otro, desde luego
mejor y sin duda posible, los mexicanos de ningún modo
vamos a permitir semejante despropósito.

Actuaremos en consecuencia, al amparo del artículo 39
de la Constitución de la República, el cual prevé,
para las circunstancias excepcionales como ésta, que
el pueblo, depositario de la soberanía nacional, tiene
en todo momento el derecho de modificar la forma de su
gobierno. Y que se oiga arriba y abajo, adentro y
afuera, fuerte y claro en todas partes: antes, durante
y después del desafuero, elevaremos nuestra capacidad
de respuesta hasta lograr el pleno restablecimiento de
la democracia y el justo castigo de quienes hoy, desde
la soberbia y la prepotencia, pretenden abolirla de un
plumazo.

A la desobediencia civil

Quienes suscribimos estos planteamientos militamos en
cuatro organizaciones ciudadanas independientes: Grupo
Ciudadano Proyecto Esperanza, Flor y Canto, Red
Nacional de Jóvenes con López Obrador y Plan de los 3
Puntos. En congruencia con nuestras ideas y
convicciones, hemos decidido formar una instancia de
coordinación a la que hemos dado el nombre de Lado
Izquierdo Opositor (LIO).

Para impedir el desafuero de López Obrador y defender
al gobierno constitucional de la ciudad de México y a
las instituciones democráticas del país, hemos
adoptado los principios de la desobediencia civil y de
la resistencia pacífica, una praxis que se remonta a
los orígenes de la cultura occidental y que fue
abrazada por Sócrates y Platón, antes que Thoreau la
sistematizara teóricamente y Gandhi la usara con éxito
para lograr la independencia de la India. Avalados por
la autoridad moral de esos gigantes, afirmamos que los
principios esenciales de la desobediencia civil son la
imaginación, la creatividad, la denuncia, la firmeza
y, el más importante de todos, la alegría.

Hemos definido un plan mínimo de acciones para esta
fase inicial de la lucha, pero antes queremos invitar
a todas las personas que coincidan con nuestras
preocupaciones, métodos y objetivos, a organizarse con
sus familiares, amigos, vecinos, compañeros de trabajo
o de desempleo, de estudios, de deporte, de ocio y de
esparcimiento, y sumarse a este esfuerzo que
históricamente está condenado a triunfar.

Tradicionalmente, la izquierda ha luchado en frentes,
bloques, vanguardias, tendencias y corrientes, pero
nosotros queremos probar otra opción geométrica.
Creemos en la pluralidad, en la diversificación y en
la convergencia de las voluntades y los sueños. Por
eso hemos formado este lado, este LIO.  Construyamos
tantos lados como existan en nuestras fantasías y
pensemos que si algo caracteriza al diamante es que
tiene precisamente muchas caras, muchos ángulos,
muchos lados. Edifiquemos una organización que
adquiera la fuerza, la luz y la belleza de los
diamantes, forjada por los siglos en las entrañas de
la tierra.

Los convocamos a sumarse al movimiento ladoísta de
desobediencia civil y resistencia pacífica que nace
hoy con la publicación de este manifiesto, en defensa
de la joven democracia mexicana.

Plan de Acción

El desafuero se dará 7 de abril de este 2005. La
comisión instructora de la Cámara de Diputados lo
anunció con sólo tres días de antelación. Por eso, en
esta primera etapa, debemos alcanzar con rapidez dos
objetivos.

Uno, poner en contacto al mayor número posible de
personas, crear los canales para que se comuniquen
entre sí, se mantengan permanentemente informadas y se
movilicen de inmediato cuando así se requiera.

Dos, hacer visible nuestro descontento en la ciudad de
México, en los estados del país y en el mundo entero,
para que el problema, creado por Fox, no por el
pueblo, ocupe el lugar que le corresponde en la agenda
política internacional.

En consonancia con lo anterior proponemos las
siguientes medidas:

1. Formar brigadas y establecer puntos de encuentro en
los pueblos, barrios, colonias y delegaciones de la
ciudad de México, para que los habitantes de la
capital del país puedan informarse y protestar sin
tener que alejarse mucho de sus domicilios.

2. Instalar campamentos en las plazas y parques de las
principales ciudades y pueblos del interior del país,
para que la gente sepa a donde acudir cuando necesite
informarse.

3. A las comunidades de mexicanos residentes en el
extranjero las exhortamos a formar comités de
solidaridad y llevar a cabo acciones de protesta
frente a las embajadas y consulados de México en el
mundo entero.

4. Desarrollar mecanismos de comunicación instantánea
a través de internet y mensajitos de teléfonos
celulares.

5. Realizar festivales artísticos, subastas, colectas
y ventas de garage para obtener recursos económicos
que serán invertidos en los gastos de propaganda. Como
no habrá una estructura central, cada lado deberá
resolver sus problemas de finanzas por su cuenta.

6. Organizar caravanas automovilísticas para recorrer
las zonas de mayor densidad habitacional y así invitar
cada día a más y más personas a incorporarse a la
lucha.

7. Cubrir con mantas de repudio al desafuero todas las
estatuas de la ciudad de México y de las ciudades y
pueblos del interior del país, así como las fachadas
de unidades habitacionales, edificios multifamiliares,
vecindades, casas particulares y negocios que se
adhieran al movimiento.

8. Fijar carteles y calcomanías de repudio al
desafuero en automóviles, taxis, microbuses,
autobuses, camiones de carga y de pasajeros, así como
pegatinas en baños de establecimientos públicos,
casetas de teléfonos, butacas de cines y en fin, todo
espacio disponible.

9. Hacer plantones frente a las casas de todos los
funcionarios públicos involucrados en la conspiración
golpista del desafuero y señalarlos con escarnio en
todos los lugares públicos donde los encontremos.

10. Organizar comisiones de seguridad para neutralizar
a los provocadores pagados por el gobierno federal que
tal vez tratarán de desorganizarnos y desacreditarnos
a los ojos de la opinión pública desvirtuando el
carácter pacífico de este movimiento.

11 .Efectuar, con carácter de urgencia, un encuentro
de todos los lados, comités, redes y otras instancias
afines, para discutir y coordinar acciones de más
largo alcance cuando la coyuntura política así lo
exija.

12. Preparar desde ahora el Congreso de los Ciudadanos
Unidos, porque después de esta etapa de lucha, que
será breve, intensa y victoriosa, tendremos que pasar
a la discusión de los 20 puntos del Programa
Alternativo de López Obrador a fin de enriquecerlo con
nuestras propuestas.

¡Viva la República Mexicana! ¡Muera el salinismo!

Lado Izquierdo Opositor

Grupo Ciudadano Proyecto Esperanza     Red Nacional de
Jóvenes con AMLO

      Yamilé Paz Paredes
    Ernesto Armendáriz

Iniciativa  Flor y Canto
Plan de los 3 Puntos

     René González Hernández
Andrés Yáñez

México DF, abril de 2005

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

http://www.jovenesamlo.com.mx/

=================================================
NO TO THE IMPEACHMENT (VIOLATION) AGAINST ANDRÉS
MANUEL LOPEZ OBRADOR!

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

MANIFESTO LADOISTA:

To the citizens of Mexico City,
To the people of Mexico,
To the people and governments of the World:

Who disobeys an unjust law, in fact  obey to a
superior principle of the Truth. Gandhi.


The violation of Mexican mayor Andrés Manuel Lopez
Obrador is a coup
d'etat against the Government of the Federal District
(City of
Mexico), against the democratic institutions of the
Mexican Republic,
against the political rights of all the citizens of
the country and
against the historical fights of the town of Mexico
and their
victories in the conquest of the effective suffrage,
the sovereignty
and the self-determination.

The violation of Lopez Obrador is a totalitarian
action, designed by
the dreg of the national policy, to impose a
bipartisan dictatorship
in benefit of the PRI and the BREAD, and mainly to
preserve impunity
of the gang of delinquents - Salinas, Fernandez de
Cevallos, Madrazo
and now the "presidential pair" and its pals -- who
for more than 20
years have maintained to Mexico sunk in the misery,
the bitterness and
the hopelessness.

We are democratic and we are arranged beforehand to
accept the
electoral defeat of Lopez Obrador, if this one cleanly
does not obtain
the majority in the ballot boxes. But their violation,
the overthrow
of the capital government and the destruction of the
electoral rights
of the Mexicans, will have gravísimas consequences
that must be known
by all the citizens of the Republic, to those who,
after examining
these ideas, we invited to assume a calm position but
it signs on the
matter and irrevocable.

Yes, because after the violation and the immediate
imprisonment of
Lopez Obrador, to whom or they have to him prepared a
cell of
extermination in a penitentiary of high security,
where they will
kidnap it accusing it of new "crimes" that or Rafael
Macedo of the
Shell has made him, the presidential elections and
legislative of 2006
they will lose all legal validity, the successor of
Fox will be a
"president" spurious, without authority no, except
which arrogue by
means of the use of the brute force, and the Congress
of the Union
will also lack legal representativeness.

In these conditions, the salinismo will obtain its
final and supreme
goal: to privatize Mexican Petroleums and the Federal
Commission of
Electricity, strategic companies without which Mexico
will stop being
economically viable. Before this dark and tragic
perspective, when to
leave us without institutions legitimate to process
transmission of
power, president Vicente Fox and his accomplices are
opening doors of
war civil and, because we loved our country and we
know of course that
its future can be very another one, more good and
without a doubt
possible, the Mexicans none we are going to allow to
resemblance
nonsense.

We will act in consequence, al shelter del article 39
of the
Constitution of the Republic, as it anticipates, for
the exceptional
circumstances like this one, that the town, deposit
taker of the
national sovereignty, has at all moment the right for
modifying the
form of its government. And that is heard above and
down, inside and
outside, hard and clear everywhere: before, during and
after the
violation, we will elevate our capacity of answer
until obtaining the
total reestablishment of the democracy and the right
punishment of
those who today, from pride and the great power, they
try to abolish
it with a stroke of the pen.

To the civil disobedience

Who we subscribed these expositions we militated in
four
independent citizen organizations: Citizen group
Project Hope, Flower
and Song, National Network of Young people with Lopez
Obrador and Plan
of the 3 Points. In congruencia with our ideas and
convictions, we
have decided to form a coordination instance to which
we have given
the name of Lado Izquierdo Opositor (LIO).

In order to prevent the violation of Lopez Obrador and
to defend to
the constitutional government of the city of Mexico
and to the
democratic institutions of the country, we have
adopted the principles
of the civil disobedience and of the pacific
resistance, one praxis
that goes back to the origins of the western culture
and that was
embraced by Sócrates and Plato, before Thoreau
systematized it
theoretically and Gandhi used it successfully to
obtain the
independence of India. Guaranteed by the moral
authority of those
giants, we affirmed that the essential principles of
the civil
disobedience are the imagination, the creativity, the
denunciation,
the firmness and, most important of all, the joy.

We have defined a minimum plan of actions for this
initial phase of
the fight, but before we want to invite all the people
who agree with
our preoccupations, methods and objectives, to
organize themselves
with its relatives, friends, neighbors, fellow workers
or of
unemployment, studies, sport, leisure and relaxation,
and to add
themselves to this effort that historically is
condemned to prevail.

Traditionally, the left has fought in fronts, blocks,
vanguards,
tendencies and currents, but we want to prove another
geometric
option. Let us create in the plurality, the
diversification and the
convergence of the wills and the dreams. For that
reason we have
formed east side, this LIO. Let us construct so many
sides as they
exist in our fantasies and we think that if something
characterizes to
the diamond it is that it has many faces indeed, many
angles, many
sides. Let us build an organization who acquires the
force, the light
and the beauty of diamonds, forged by the centuries in
the Earth
entrails.

We summoned them to add to the ladoísta movement of
civil
disobedience and pacific resistance that is born today
with the
publication of this manifesto, in defense of the young
Mexican
democracy.

Plan of Action

The violation will occur 7 of April of this 2005. The
instructional commission of the House of
Representatives announced
just by three days of advance. For that reason, in
this first stage,
we must reach two objectives quickly.

One, to put in contact to the greater possible number
of people, to
create the channels so that they communicate to each
other, stays
informed permanently and they are mobilized
immediately when therefore
it is required.

Two, to make our displeasure in the city of Mexico,
the states of the
country visible and throughout the world, so that the
problem, created
by Fox, not by the town, occupies the place that
corresponds to him in
international the political agenda.

In consonancia with the previous thing we propose the
following
measures:

1. To form brigades and to establish points of contact
in the towns,
districts, colonies and delegations of the city of
Mexico, so that the
inhabitants of the capital of the country can inquire
and protest
without having to move away much of their addresses.

2. To install campings in the seats and parks of the
main cities and
towns of the interior of the country, so that people
know to where
going when she needs to inquire.

3. To the communities of Mexican residents abroad we
exhorted them to
form solidarity committees and to carry out protest
actions in front
of to the embassies and consulates of Mexico
throughout the world.

4. To develop to mechanisms of instantaneous
communication through
Internet and mensajitos of cellular telephones.

5. To make artistic festivales, auctions, you collect
and garage sales
to obtain economic resources that will be invested in
the expenses of
propaganda. Since there is no a central structure,
each side will have
to solve its problems of finances by its account.

6. To organize automobile caravans to cross the zones
of greater
habitacional density and thus to invite every day to
and more people
to get up itself more to the fight.

7. To cover with blankets with repudio to the
violation all the
statues with the city of Mexico and the cities and
towns of the
interior of the country, as well as the multifamiliar
facades of
habitacionales units, buildings, particular
vicinities, houses and
businesses that adhere to the movement.

8. To fix posters and transfers of repudio to the
violation to
automobiles, taxis, microbus, buses, trucks and of
passengers, as well
as stickers in baths of establishments public, houses
of telephones,
armchairs of cinemas and in short, all space
available.

9. To make long waits in front of the houses of all
the officials
government involved in the conspiracy coup participant
of the
violation and to indicate them with escarnio in all
the places public
where we find them.

10. To organize security commissions to neutralize to
the provokers
paid by the federal government who will perhaps try to
disorganize to
us and to  discredit us to the eyes of the public
opinion being
weakened the Pacific character of this movement.

11 Efectuar, with urgency character, a compatible
encounter of all the
sides, committees, networks and other instances, to
discuss and to
coordinate actions of more long reach when the
political conjuncture
therefore demands it.

12. To from now on prepare the Congress of the
Citizens United,
because after this stage of fight, that will be brief,
intense and
victorious, we will have to happen to the discussion
of the 20 points
of the Alternative Program of Lopez Obrador in order
to enrich it with
our proposals.

The Mexican Republic lives! The salinismo dies!

Competing Left Side

Citizen group Project Hope National Network of Young
people
with AMLO

      Yamilé Peace Walls Ernesto Armendáriz

Initiative Flower and Song Plan of the 3 Points

     René González Hernandez Andrés Yáñez

Mexico DF, April of 2005

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

http://www.jovenesamlo.com.mx/
==========================================
NON À L'ABUS CONTRE ANDRES MANUEL LÓPEZ OBRADOR !

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

MANIFESTE LADOISTA :

Aux citoyens de la Ville du Mexique,
au peuple du Mexique,
aux peuples et aux gouvernements du Monde :

Que desobedece une loi injuste, en réalité ne fait
qu'obéir à un
principe supérieur de la Vérité.
Gandhi.


L'abus contre le maire mexicain Andres Manuel López
Obrador est un
coup d'état contre le Gouvernement du Secteur Fédéral
(Ville du
Mexique), contre les institutions démocratiques de la
République
mexicaine, contre les droits politiques de tous les
citoyens du pays
et contre les luttes historiques du peuple du Mexique
et ses victoires
dans la conquête du suffrage effectif, la souveraineté
et
l'autodétermination.

L'abus contre López Obrador est une action
totalitaire, conçue par la
scorie de la politique nationale, pour imposer une
dictature
bipartidista au bénéfice du PRI et du PAIN, et surtout
pour
préserver l'impunité de la bande de délinquants -
Salinas,
Fernández de Cevallos, Madrazo et maintenant la "paire
présidentielle" et ses pal -- qui pendant plus de 20
années ont
maintenu au Mexique descendu dans la misère,
l'amertume et la
desesperanza.

Nous sommes démocrates et sommes disposés à l'avance à
accepter la
défaite électorale de López Obrador, si celui-ci
n'obtient pas
proprement la majorité dans les urnes. Mais son abus,
le
derrocamiento du gouvernement métropolitain et la
destruction des
droits électoraux de de ce qui est mexicains, auront
des
conséquences graves qui doivent être des connaissances
par tous les
citoyens de la République, à auxquels, après avoir
examiné ces
idées, nous invitons à assumer une position calme mais
ferme et
indéclinable à ce sujet.

Oui, parce qu'après l'abus et l'immédiat
emprisonnement de López
Obrador, à auquel ils l'ont déjà préparée une cellule
d'exterminio dans un pénitencier de haute sécurité, où
ils le
kidnapperont en l'accusant de nouvelles "infractions"
que l'a déjà
fabriquées Rafaël Macedo de la Coquille, les élections
présidentielles et législatives de de 2006 perdront
toute validité
juridique, le successeur de Fox sera un "président"
espurio, sans
autorité aucune, sauf laquelle se par l'utilisation de
la force
brute, et le Congrès de l'Union manquera également de
représentativité légale.

Dans ces conditions, le salinismo obtiendra son
objectif final et
suprême : privatiser du Pétrole mexicain et la
Commission Fédérale
d'Électricité, entreprises stratégiques sans
lesquelles le Mexique
cessera d'être économiquement viable. Devant cette
perspective
foncée et tragique, en nous laissant sans institution
légitime pour
traiter la transmission du pouvoir, le président
Vicente Fox et ses
complices ils ouvrent les portes de la guerre civile
et, parce que
nous aimons à notre pays et savons que son futur peut
être très un
autre, évidemment mieux et sans doute possible, ce qui
est mexicains
en aucune façon nous allons permettre ressemblance
despropósito.

Agirons en conséquence, al abri del article 39 de la
Constitution de
la République, quel prévoit, pour les circonstances
exceptionnelles
comme celle-ci, que le peuple, dépositaire de la
souveraineté
nationale, a à tout moment le droit de modifier la
forme de son
gouvernement. Et qui est en haut entendu vers le bas
et, à
l'intérieur et dehors, fort et clairement dans toutes
parties :
avant, pendant et après l'abus, nous élèverons notre
capacité de
réponse jusqu'à obtenir le plein rétablissement de la
démocratie
et la punition juste de desquelles aujourd'hui, depuis
la fierté et
la prepuissance, ils prétendent l'abolir d'un plumazo.

À la désobéissance civile

Que nous souscrivons ces approches nous militons dans
quatre
organisations des citoyens indépendantes : Groupe Des
citoyens Projet
Espoir, Fleur et Chanson, Réseau National de Jeunes
avec López
Obrador et Plan des 3 Points. En congruence avec nos
idées et
convictions, nous avons décidé de former une instance
de
coordination à à laquelle nous avons donné le nom de
Côté Gauche
Adverse (PROBLÈME).

Pour empêcher l'abus de López Obrador et défendre au
gouvernement
constitutionnel de la ville du Mexique et les
institutions
démocratiques du pays, nous avons adopté les principes
de la
désobéissance civile et  de la résistance pacifique,
une praxis qui
remonte aux origines de la culture occidentale et qui
a été
embrassée par Sócrates et Platón, avant que Thoreau la
systématise
théoriquement et Gandhi l'utiliserait avec succès pour
obtenir
l'indépendance de l'Inde. Garantis par l'autorité
morale de ces
géants, nous affirmons que les principes essentiels de
la
désobéissance civile sont l'imagination, la
créativité, la
dénonciation, la fermeté et, le plus important que
tous, la joie.

Nous avons défini un plan minimal d'actions pour cette
phase initiale
de la lutte, mais le voulons avant inviter à toutes
les personnes qui
coïncident avec nos préoccupations, méthodes et
objectifs, à
organiser avec leurs parents, amis, voisins,
compagnons de travail ou
   de chômage,  d'études,  de sport,  de loisir et  de
dissémination, et s'ajouter à cet effort qui est
historiquement
condamné triompher.

Traditionnellement, la gauche a combattu dans des
fronts, blocs,
avant-gardes, tendances y courants, mais nous voulons
prouver une autre option géométrique.
Nous croyons dans la pluralité, dans le
diversification et dans la convergence des volontés et
les rêves.C'est pourquoi nous avons formé ce côté, ce
PROBLÈME. Construisons tant de côtés comme ils
existent dans nos fantaisies et pensions que si
quelque chose caractérise au diamant est qu'a
précisément beaucoup de faces, beaucoup d'angles,
beaucoup côtés. Construisons une organisation qui
acquiert la force, la lumière et la beauté des
diamants, forgée pour les siècles dans tu elles
entraînes de la terre.

Les nous convoquons s'ajouter au mouvement ladoísta
désobéissance
civile et résistance pacifique qui

il naît aujourd'hui avec la publication de ce
manifeste, en défense
de la jeune démocratie mexicaine.

Plan d'Action

L'abus sera donné 7 avril ce 2005. La commission
instructeur de la
Chambre de Députés

il l'a annoncé avec seulement trois jours
d'anticipation. C'est
pourquoi, dans cette première étape, nous devons
atteindre avec

rapidité deux objectifs.

Un, mettre en contact au plus grand nombre possible de
personnes,
créer les canaux pour que se

ils communiquent entre eux, ils soient de façon
permanente maintenus
informées et ils seront mobilisés immédiatement quand

soyez ainsi requis.

Deux, rendre visible notre mécontentement dans la
ville du Mexique,
dans les états du pays et dans le

monde complet, pour que le problème, créé par Fox, non
par le
peuple, occupez le lieu que le

il correspond dans l'agenda politique international.

En accord avec ce qui précède nous proposons les
mesures suivantes :

1. former des brigades et établir des points de
rencontre dans les
peuples, les quartiers, colonies y

délégations de la ville du Mexique, pour que les
habitants de la
capital du pays puissent

s'informer et protester sans devoir s'éloigner
beaucoup de ses
domiciles.

2. installer des campements dans les places et les
parcs les
principales villes et les peuples de le

intérieur du pays, pour que les gens sachent à à où
aller quand il
aura besoin d'informer.

3. aux Communautés de résidents mexicains  à
l'étranger nous les
exhortons former des comités de

solidarité et mener à bien des actions de protestation
face aux
ambassades et aux consulats du Mexique dans

le monde complet.

4. développer des mécanismes de communication
instantanée à
travers internet et mensajitos de

téléphones cellulaires.

5. effectuer des festivals artistiques, adjudications,
collectes et
ventes de garage pour obtenir des ressources

économiques qui seront investi dans les frais de
publicité. Comme il
n'y aura pas une structure

centrale, chaque côté devra résoudre ses problèmes de
finances par
son compte.

6. organiser des caravanes automobilistiques pour
parcourir les zones
d'une plus grande densité habitacional y

inviter ainsi chaque jour à de plus en plus de
personnes à
s'incorporer à la lutte.

7. couvrir avec des couvertures de je répudie à l'abus
toutes les
statues de la ville du Mexique et de le

villes et peuples de l'intérieur du pays, ainsi que
les façades
d'unités habitacionales,

bâtiments pluri-familiaux, voisinages, maisons
particulières et
affaires qui adhèrent à le

mouvement.

8. fixer des affiches et des décalcomanies de je
répudie à l'abus
dans des automobiles, des taxis, minibus,

autobus, camions de charge et  de passagers, ainsi
qu'autocollants
dans des bains d'établissements

publics, postes de téléphones, butacas de cinémas et
en fin, tout
espace disponible.

9. faire des plants face aux maisons de tous les
fonctionnaires
publics insérés dans le

conspiración golpista de l'abus et les indiquer avec
escarnio dans
tous les lieux publics où

les trouvons.

10. Organiser des commissions de sécurité pour
neutraliser ce qui
est provocadores payés par le gouvernement

fédéral que traiteront peut-être de désorganiser nous
et nous
discréditer aux yeux de l'avis

publique en affaiblissant le caractère pacifique de ce
mouvement.

11 Effectuer, à titre d'urgence, une rencontre de tous
les côtés,
comités, réseaux et d'autres

instances connexes, pour examiner et coordonner des
actions de plus
longue portée quand la conjoncture

politique ainsi l'exige.

12. Préparer dorénavant le Congrès des Citoyens Unis,
parce
qu'après cette étape de

lutte, qui sera brève, intense et victorieuse, nous
devrons passer à
la discussion des 20 points

du Programme Alternatif de López Obrador afin de
l'enrichir avec nos
propositions.

Vivat la République mexicaine ! Mourez le salinismo !

Côté Gauche Adverse

Groupe Des citoyens Projet Espoir Réseau National de
Jeunes avec AMLO

      Yamilé Paix Parois Ernesto Armendáriz

Initiative Fleur et Chanson Plan des 3 Points

     René González Hernández Andres Yáñez

Le Mexique DF, avril 2005

http://www.plandelos3puntos.org/

http://www.jovenesamlo.com.mx/





______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡250 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es

  JORNADA ESTATAL DE MOVILIZACIÓN DEL 2 DE ABRIL:

 

 

         POR LOS DERECHOS DE L@S INMIGRANTES

 

           POR LA FLEXIBILIZACIÓN DE LOS REQUISITOS

 

              POR LA AMPLIACIÓN DEL PROCESO DE NORMALIZACIÓN.

 

       VIERNES 1 DE ABRIL DESDE LAS 20H. HASTA 11H. (sábado 2): ENCIERRO

LUGAR:  IGLESIA SAN MIGUEL ARCÁNGEL Y SAN SEBASTIÁN

Calle QUART Nº 97 VALENCIA

   SÁBADO 2 DE ABRIL A LAS 11,30H. CONCENTRACIÓN-DENUNCIA

  (para denunciar la situación de los subsaharianos instalados allí desde su traslado desde canarias)

                                               LUGAR: BAJO PUENTE DE NUEVO CENTRO

                    FINAL DE LA GRAN VÍA FERNANDO CATÓLICO. VALENCIA

 

CONVOCAN:

FORO ALTERNATIVO DE LA INMIGRACIÓN

MESA D’ENTITATS DE SOLIDARITATS AMB ELS IMMIGRANTS.

---

 MANIFIESTO

JORNADA DE MOVILIZACION DEL 2 DE ABRIL:

POR LOS DERECHOS DE LA INMIGRACION

Y LA AMPLIACION DEL PROCESO DE NORMALIZACION.

El Foro Alternativo de la Inmigración y la Mesa d`Entitats de Solidaritat amb els Inmigrants MANIFIESTAN:

        En noviembre de 2004, con ocasión del Foro Social Europeo de Londres se acordó el 2 de Abril como Día de los/as Trabajadores/as Inmigrantes, jornada de lucha y sensibilización en pro de los derechos de las personas sin papeles en toda Europa.

    La consideración que tenemos los/as inmigrantes, de personas sin derechos que mantienen las instituciones y los gobiernos europeos, y que se consagra en el Tratado Constitucional europeo, junto con una política de control policial de los flujos migratorios mediante Centros de Internamiento, que son antesala de la expulsión hacen necesario que nos movilicemos por todos los rincones de Europa en defensa de nuestros derechos (a vivienda, a la libre circulación y residencia, contra el racismo y la xenofobia, por unas condiciones dignas de trabajo). Las movilizaciones previstas en el estado español, para el día 2 de Abril están necesariamente condicionadas por el insuficiente proceso de normalización que se está produciendo en estos meses, por lo que convierte este día de lucha en algo relevante a enlazar con las movilizaciones y encierros que desde principios de año 2005 estamos realizando en todo el estado los/as inmigrantes y las organizaciones de solidaridad para una flexibilización de los criterios en este proceso de "Normalización" iniciado el 7 de Febrero de 2005.

    Este proceso de regularización, que durará 3 meses, es insuficiente, tanto para regularizar documentalmente a más de 280.000 de personas sin papeles que se encuentran en el País Valenciano, un millón de en el territorio español, como para alcanzar el objetivo del gobierno del eliminar la economía sumergida

    Es prácticamente IMPOSIBLE que la mayoría de inmigrantes logremos las
tres condiciones que el Gobierno requiere en esta Normalización:

a) inscripción en el padrón del municipio antes del 7 de agosto del 2004

b) un contrato de trabajo por 6 meses.

c) Antecedentes penales del país de origen.

   Ya que una parte de los múltiples problemas que los/as trabajadores/as sin papeles nos encontramos en este periodo de "Regularización" son:

   Una gran mayoría de las/os inmigrantes que podemos ser incluidos/as en este proceso, y que nos encontramos en el estado español desde una fecha anterior al 7 de agosto de 2004, no nos hallamos registrados en los padrones municipales por el temor a ser detenidos desde que la policía puede acceder a estas informaciones, lo que impide nuestra regularización.

   Obtener un contrato de 6 meses para una persona sin papeles es muy difícil cuando la precariedad laboral afecta a toda la clase trabajadora del Estado español. Este requisito está produciendo el efecto justo contrario. La dificultad que encontramos para conseguir un contrato de trabajo ocasiona fraudes, como el pago del propio inmigrante de las cuotas de la seguridad social correspondientes al empleador o la necesidad de darse de alta en el sector de servicio doméstico discontinuo, la mayoría nos quedamos al margen por falta de voluntad de los empresarios y de los empleadores del servicio doméstico e incluso algunos empresarios nos están despidiendo de los puestos de trabajo.

    La presentación del certificado de antecedentes penales del país de origen, crea un requisito que no puede ser cumplido por muchos de nosotros/as pues algunos de nuestros países no prevén esta documentación si no se está en el país. Otras veces la lentitud de la burocracia de los gobiernos ocasionará que el certificado de penales llegue después de concluir el proceso el próximo 7 de Mayo lo que impide regularizarnos.

Con estos requisitos está claro que, después del 7 de mayo, la gran mayoría de los inmigrantes continuaremos SIN PAPELES. Por todos estos argumentos:

SOLICITAMOS:

1. Que se admita como prueba de estancia en España no solamente el certificado del padrón sino cualquier otro documento considerado válido en derecho. Que sea demostrable mediante los demás documentos que prevén las leyes: Pasaporte, títulos de viaje y documentación de actividad económica, bancaria, etc.

2. Que solo se le reclame antecedentes penales a los ciudadanos/as de aquellos países en los que sea posible realizarlo mediante Servicio Diplomático en el Estado español. Que se permita la tramitación de las peticiones de regularización que aporten solicitud del certificado de penales aunque este certificado se adjunte más tarde, incluso después del 7 de mayo. En los casos de inmigrantes cuyo país de origen carezca de embajada u oficina consular en España, se considerará suficiente la carencia de antecedentes penales durante su estancia en territorio español

3. Que se suprima el contrato de seis meses como requisito indispensable para la Regularización. Para solucionar este escollo proponemos el estudio conjunto de un abanico de medidas incluyendo el acceso a un VISADO DE BUSQUEDA DE EMPLEO por tres meses, renovables, que permita la inscripción en los servicios de empleo sin retornar al país de origen a los extranjeros que manifiesten su interés en regularizar su situación, para así poder encontrar un trabajo fuera de la economía sumergida. La denuncia de inspección de trabajo es un instrumento clave para permitir a los sindicatos intervenir contra la economía sumergida sin que ello redunde en contra del trabajador inmigrante

4. La flexibilidad en el plazo de la normalización: permitir a aquellos empresarios que firmen un contrato de trabajo dentro del periodo de normalización, efectuar el alta en la Seguridad Social a lo largo del año en curso, atendiendo así a las características estacionales propias de la agricultura, la construcción, la hostelería, el turismo...

5. Que se proceda de oficio al archivo de los expedientes de expulsión incoados y a la revocación de las órdenes de expulsión dictadas contra las personas que soliciten la autorización de residencia por motivo de arraigo. Que se suspendan las expulsiones y detenciones motivadas por la falta administrativa de carecer de documentos en regla.

6. Que se permita a los trabajadoras/os autónomos acogerse al proceso de normalización mediante la presentación de un proyecto solvente de actividad.

7. "Ningún(a) niño(a) sin papeles": que el proceso de normalización incluya a los menores indocumentados

8. Que en consonancia con la voluntad de diálogo expresada por el gobierno, que las voces las de los y las inmigrantes de sean oídas en la definición e implementación de las políticas de inmigración.

Por estos argumentos, llamamos a la sociedad valenciana y a las organizaciones solidarias a sumarse a las diferentes movilizaciones y actos que este próximo 2 de Abril se llevaran a cabo en Valencia y en toda la geografía del Estado español.

 

                 Foro Alternativo de la Inmigración

                                                      y la Mesa d`Entitats de Solidaritat amb els Inmigrants

Barcelona
7,8 y 9 de abril de 2005

Centro Cívico Convento de Sant Agustí Vell C/ Comerç, 36 (Barcelona)
Organiza:
SODEPAU

Colaboran:
SODEPAZ
Plataforma Rural
Xarxa Consum SOlidari
Campaña "No et mengis el món"
Progrma
http://www.sodepaz.org/Comercio%20Justo/jornadas_abril2005.htm


LLAMAMIENTO SOBRE EL SELLO FLO de Comercio Justo
Consumo Responsable ANTE LA PROPUESTA DE CREAR UNA INICIATIVA NACIONAL
PARA IMPULSAR EL SELLO FAIRTRADE LABELLING ORGANISATION INTERNATIONAL
(FLO-INTERNATIONAL), LOS ABAJO FIRMANTES DECLARAMOS:
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2583


---------------------------------------
SODEPAZ
Solidaridad para el Desarrollo y la Paz
www.sodepaz.org
www.sodepaz.net
Telefonos:
91 522 80 91
902 367 192 (si llamas de fuera de Madrid en más económico)
616 40 44 44 (si llamas desde un móvil es más económico)

6 detinguts per intentar fer un tall de transit en suport als
treballadors de Miniwatt
La multinacional holandesa Philips, després de destruir 12.000 llocs
de treball a l'Estat espanyol en els últims 20 anys, ara, fusionada
amb la coreana LG, ha decidit tancar les seves fabriques a Catalunya
(Novalux, Lámparas Z i Miniwatt) i desplaçar totes les produccions a
països amb mà d'obra semi esclava, com la Xina o Indonèsia. Per
aquesta operació, prop de 1.000 treballadors i les seves famílies es
veuran directament afectats per l'atur i la precarietat a Catalunya, i
també la resta de treballadors, ja que es liquiden d'una tirada 1.000
llocs de treball estables i amb salaris dignes, cosa que repercutirà
d'alguna manera en el conjunt de la indústria catalana.

Aquest matí a 2/4 de 8 s'ha realitzat un tall de trànsit a la Gran Via
cantonada amb el carrer Moianès, molt a prop de plaça Espanya, en
solidaritat amb els treballadors de Miniwatt.

Una ràpida reacció policial ha sorprès la gent un cop ja realitzada
l'acció i ha començat una persecució pels carrers de Sants. De moment
ja s'han confirmat 6 detencions. Se sap que es troben a la comissaria
d'Aiguablava (Nou Barris) i que ja han començat a designar advocat.
S'ha convocat una concentració davant de la comissaria (M Trinitat
Nova, L4) per a les 12h.

Salut i prou Repressió!!!

EL GENOCIDIO CONTRA LA COMUNIDAD DE PAZ-Colombia
Comunidad de Paz San José
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2587

En memoria de Luís Eduardo Guerra
Líder de la comunidad y miembro del Consejo Interno desde el comienzo de este
proceso ejemplar, de resistencia civil).
Asesinado hace un mes
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2585

Declaración sobre la masacre de San José de Apartado en Colombia
Izquierda Unitaria Europea
Strasbourg, Parlamento europeo, 10 de Marzo de 2005
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2588


Otras informaciones:
LLAMAMIENTO SOBRE EL SELLO FLO de Comercio Justo

ANTE LA PROPUESTA DE CREAR UNA INICIATIVA NACIONAL PARA IMPULSAR EL SELLO
FAIRTRADE LABELLING ORGANISATION INTERNATIONAL (FLO-INTERNATIONAL), LOS ABAJO
FIRMANTES DECLARAMOS:
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2583


carta de denuncia de los ataques a los DDHH en Oaxaca
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2582


Nueva campaña de desinformación: Fidel “millonario” y líder internacional “peor
valorado"
Francisco Calderón
SODEPAZ
http://www.cubasolidaridad.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=793

TURISMO SOLIDARIO-TRABAJO VOLUNTARIO
Programa Viajes 2005
http://www.sodepaz.org/viajes2005/index.html


3as JORNADAS DE CONSUMO RESPONSABLE
Barcelona, 7,8 y 9 de abril de 2005
PROGRAMA
http://www.sodepaz.org/Comercio%20Justo/jornadas_abril2005.htm



---------------------------------------
SODEPAZ
Solidaridad para el Desarrollo y la Paz
www.sodepaz.org
www.sodepaz.net
Telefonos:
91 522 80 91
902 367 192 (si llamas de fuera de Madrid en más económico)
616 40 44 44 (si llamas desde un móvil es más económico)

Entidades firmantes:

A cova da terra, Afoca, Apassos, Aram Món Alternatiu, Colectivo de Apoyo a
la Rebelión Zapatista, Delaterra, DiDeSUR,
Elkartruke, Emaús Fundación Social, Jayma, La Aldea del Sur,L’arcu la
vieya, L'ecoespai de Rusafa, Mon Verd, Pachamama,
Panxea,Picu Rabicu, Sodepau, Sodepau P.V. Sodepaz, Tota Cuca Viu, Userda
9, Xarxa de Consum Solidari

Texto completo
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2583



Otras informaciones
El boicot a Israel: Es la hora de los hechos y no de las palabras.
PALESTINA Por Alberto Arce.
Miembro de la Red de Solidaridad contra la Ocupación de Palestina.
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2579


carta de denuncia de los ataques a los DDHH en Oaxaca
America Latina Anonymous escribió "Información sobre la situación de los
indígenas de Oaxaca (Mexico), proveniente de la charla realizada en el
local de Ecologistas en Acción el pasado 1 de marzo
http://www.sodepaz.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2582

Nueva campaña de desinformación: Fidel “millonario” y líder internacional
“peor valorado"
Francisco Calderón
SODEPAZ
http://www.cubasolidaridad.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=793


---------------------------------------
SODEPAZ
Solidaridad para el Desarrollo y la Paz
www.sodepaz.org
www.sodepaz.net
Telefonos:
91 522 80 91
902 367 192 (si llamas de fuera de Madrid en más económico)
616 40 44 44 (si llamas desde un móvil es más económico)

From: info@...

Foro Social de la Mediterránea JORNADAS DE REFLEXIÓN Y DEBATE
  De cara al 1er FORUM SOCIAL DE LA MEDITERRÁNEA (FSMed)
(Barcelona junio 2005)
Por un Mediterráneo de Pau, Justicia y Fraternidad
JORNADAS DE REFLEXIÓN Y DEBATE
Días 18 y 19 de marzo de 2005
LUGAR:
Aula 1
*CCCB, Centro de Cultura Contemporánea de Barcelona *Montalegre 7 ·Barcelona

Àgora nord sud, ATTAC, CC.OO, CGT, CIEMEN, Desenvolupament Comunitari,
Fundació A. Comín, Fundació per la Pau, IAC, Intermón-Oxfam, Justícia i
Pau, Marcha Mundial de Dones, Observatori del Deute en la Globalització,
RAI, SODEPAU, Xarxa de Consum Solidari, Xarxa de Mobilització Global…
(entidades de la Asamblea promotora del FSMed).

Llamamiento y programa
http://www.forosocialmadrid.org/more.php?id9_0_1_0_M




----- Fin del Mensaje reenviado -----



---------------------------------------
SODEPAZ
Solidaridad para el Desarrollo y la Paz
www.sodepaz.org
www.sodepaz.net
Telefonos:
91 522 80 91
902 367 192 (si llamas de fuera de Madrid en más económico)
616 40 44 44 (si llamas desde un móvil es más económico)