Bonjour cher Don (Tercero)

Je suis très heureux de vous retrouver dans Linguamundi.

Je vais lire au sujet des travaux de Ruhlen

avant de développer plus avant ma théorie relative

à la relation entre le proto-basque

et la partie cachée de la naissance de l'écriture

à la fin de la préhistoire.

*

De l'aveu même de Champollion l'étude de la langue copte

lui a donné un avantage décisif sur son concurrent anglais

pour son déchiffrement des hiéroglyphes.

*

Très amicalement,

Jacques

*

--- En linguamundi@yahoogroups.com, Exolinguist <exolinguist@y...>
escribió:
>
> --- Jacques Dehée <jacquesdehe@y...> wrote:
>
> >
> > The dark side of language is not yet visible,
> >
> > lost in prehistory.
>
> That's pretty much true, though the work of Ruhlen,
> and others (the "long-rangers") shows that a lot can
> be learned.
>
> >
> > Proto-euskara might be for it the revealor
> >
>
> Why do you say that? Since we have only closely
> related Basque dialects, with no other relationships
> established, we cannot go back very far.
>
> > that Copt was for Egyptian and its hieroglyphic
> > script.
> >
>
> Coptic helped to decipher the hieroglyphic writing,
> but it has not allowed us to arrive at a correct
> phonology of classical Egyptian. This is because the
> ancient Egyptians did not, for the most part, write
> their vowels. The speakers of Coptic did, but there is
> wild disagreement among the Coptic dialects. We do not
> even have a proto-Coptic, let alone a credible
> proto-Euskara. This is partly because Euskara was
> seldom if ever written before the 1600s, but also
> because no more distant relationships have been
> established.
>
> Helsningar til ala,
>
> --Don T
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/almensk
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>