Please register and write rather in Spanish, your most natural
language.
Thank you

--- En linguamundi@yahoogroups.com, "ze_ome" <ze_ome@y...> escribió:
>
> hello, how are you?
> the lingua mundi project looks relatively promising. but i still
> think that the whole ,,not just for linguists,, argument is a
little
> idealistic. we must admit, althought the conlang community has
been
> growing more than exponentially in these last years, we are still
a
> minority in the english speaking world, in which i would think, is
> the majority of us. ive been amazed by the number of french and
> portugese conlangers, but havent yet found a spanish conlang
group. i
> am a native mexican, and i would like to see some enthusiasm [if
any
> of you know of spanish-native conlangs, please inform me.
> ive only recently ,,entered,, the conlanging community online, as
> late as last year i still thought that conlanging had had its
heyday
> back in the fifty years after esperanto came out of poland.
> i am a high school student, so probably stilll very naive in many
> respects. even my grammar, which is, im proud to say, acceptable,
> could do with some refining. im scared to death of gerunds.
however,
> from what ive seen, with the explosion of constructed languages
has
> come a really dangerous chaos and lack of structure. yahoo groups
> alone, there seems to be a painful absence of a sense of
community,
> which i think is odd, seeing as to how other, larger groups such
as
> stamp collectors and whatnot have managed to stick together. i
> understand that conlanging is a lonely work, unless you have the
> incredibly good luck of having a friend with whom you share this
> interest. but even then, each of you will eventually venture your
> own way, wanting creative control of your ,,masterpiece,,.
> but anyway. if someone is going to become involved in a lingua
mundi,
> or anything of the sort, they must have a deep desire to see it
> through to the end, a strong love and admiration of language. this
is
> what i think is the essence of a linguist. but i might be wrong,
> whatever. i dont mean this to be an authoriative treatise or
anything
> of the sort. conlangers should get together sometime and get to
know
> each other. is there no association currently in existence that is
in
> a position to do this? i dont mean something like the people who
> built interlingua. [please, ,,interliguists,, dont take this the
> wrong way. interlingua is a beautiful work of art, esperanto seems
> clunky compared to it, this coming from a young esperantist]
because
> that was markedly a romance language, and it was made, to my
> understanding, by professional ,,linguists,, whatever that means.
i
> think that conlang enthusiasts as a whole may be more
linguistically
> progressive, since we are mostly working by ourselves, in our
living
> rooms, making languages in front of the tv or eating fast food. i
> might be alond in thei