Hola a todos

Tom Schotte ha enviado este mensaje que os adjunto para que
deliberemos y votemos lo que nos parezca mejor. Todo viene porque se
integra a Noruega en el ciclo de EGP's y llegamos a 12.

Dear all,

as Norway joined the cycle (by announcing a date), the total number of
tournaments comes to 12. As discussed before this is way too much to
assure a large number of participants in every tournament.

First of all I think we should vote to 'allow' Norway to organize its
EGP (something similar like we did with German EGP 2008)
Also we should decide in case the vote was positive, if it is still
the best 5 EGPs will count in the 2009 cycle or we should switch to
the 6 bests.

Secondly we should have a vote on the EGP Cycle 2010. Deciding the
exact system seems very very hard, but an initial vote could be made
on how many EGP's should be organized in 2010. After having decided
that, we could figure out a system that fits into that.

We know there is a lot of talking and a lack of decisions in the
Eurothfed, but this will be the first step in sorting out the European
Grand Prix.

To conclude:

Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy,
Spain, Sweden, Poland, Czech Republic and Denmark should vote:

Is Norway allowed to organize an EGP which will be included in the
2009 Cycle?
1) YES
2) NO

Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy,
Spain, Sweden, Poland, Czech Republic, Denmark and Norway should vote:

In the 2009 EGP Cycle with 12 EGPs included, the N best will count for
the total number of points? N should be
1) 5
2) 6

Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy,
Spain, Sweden, Poland, Czech Republic, Denmark and Norway should vote:

In the 2010 EGP Cycle how many EGPs should be organized? (this is
order to find a system afterwards that fits in this vote). Here it is
be possible to vote for multiple options.
1) 12
2) 11
3) 10
4) 9
5) 8
6) 7
7) 6