Entrar
¿Usuario nuevo? Regístrate
tgecv · T. G. Evolución Condicionada de la Vida
? ¿Ya estás suscrito? Entrar en Yahoo!

Consejos de Yahoo! Grupos

¿Sabías que...?
Puedes buscar mensajes antiguos en un grupo.

Mensajes

  Mensajes Ayuda
Avanzado
Fw: [M-StarTrek] Fw: [UFO sig] Evolution of the brain and intelligen   Lista de mensajes  
Responder | Reenviar Mensaje #97 de 114 |
Re: [tgecv] RE: Fw: [M-StarTrek] Fw: [UFO sig] Evolution of the brain and intelligence: SETI study

En realidad, justamente en ST TNG (la nueva generacion) sí hablan de la
evolucion en varias ocasiones, pero siempre como teoría y no como dato
cierto. Esto da lugar a que en varios casos presenten mundos de "evolucion
dirigida" por una especie superior, e incluso en un capítulo doble (cuyo
nombre lamentablemente no recuerdo) descubren que todos los humanoides en
realidad comparten un origen comun dado por una especie ultraevolucionada
que hacía miles de millones de años "sabía" que el universo iba a implotar y
re-explotar, decidiendo entonces desparramar sus genes en, bueno, el
pre-big-bang y así justifican que la mayoría de las especies inteligentes
fueran humanoides y hasta pudieran mezclarse.

Sin embargo, en TOS (la serie original) presentan muchos más seres
inteligentes completamente distintos a nosotros, incluyendo en la relación
masa encefálica/peso corporal, lo mismo pasa en VGR y DS9, mientras que ENT
vuelve a la tradición humanocentrista (?) y todos son humanoides...

Slds

Anabel
Argentina

----- Original Message -----
From: "jossemolina" <versee2@...>
To: <tgecv@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:31 AM
Subject: [tgecv] RE: Fw: [M-StarTrek] Fw: [UFO sig] Evolution of the brain
and intelligence: SETI study




Estoy totalmente de acuerdo contigo Anabel, Star Trek es
impresionante en cuanto a exposición de ideas supermodernas sobre
los conceptos de la vida y muchas ramas de la ciencia como
psicología, física, biología y especialmente sobre el funcionamiento
del cerebro. En concreto sobre evolución más que explicar nada
concreto nos pone delante de un mundo que habla por sí solo y por
supuesto no citan para nada la evolución por mutaciones.
Para mí, Star Trek ha hecho más por la evolución del pensamiento
humano que nadie por haber conseguido llevar todos estos conceptos
más o menos filosóficos a grandes capas de población.
Me refiero sobre todo a la seria "Star Trek - The Next Generation".
Recuerdo cuando vi por primera vez esta serie, allá por 1990/91 que
me encantó porque en algunos casos me sorprendió el encontrar ideas
similares a las mías por primera vez, y desde luego no me las
copiaron :)

Jose

Nota: Se han dado de baja dos miembros últimamente, no sé si por mis
mensajes o por el tuyo en inglés, en cualquier caso, dado el escaso
volumen de mensajes creo que se puede escribir en cualquier idioma
sin peligro de inundar a los miembros con miles de mensajes en su
buzón.

--- En tgecv@yahoogroups.com, Anabel <perezbem@y...> escribió:
> En inglés.
>
> Slds.
>
> Anabel
> *************
>
>
> This article from Space.com relates to the evolution of the brain
and
> intelligence in humans and cetaceans, within the context of
whether there's
> intelligent life on other planets. As we know, Spock knew all
about this
> quite some time ago when he visited the Cetacean Institute.
>
> This is, once again, obvious proof that Star Trek is merely
history told in
> advance, not mere "science fiction."
>
> **********************
>
> Space.com
> Friday, October 29, 2004
>
>
>
>
>
> Intelligence Gathering: The Study of How the
> Brain Evolves Offers Insight into the Mind
>
>
> By Seth Shostak
> SETI Institute
> SPACE.com
> Is there really life out there? Was a kinder, wetter Mars once
dotted by
> bacterial blooms whose progeny now await our discovery? Do unseen,
alien
> microbes swim in the buried oceans of Europa, Callisto, or
Ganymede? What
> about Titan's sub-zero methane lakes?
> We still don't know whether any of these nearby worlds houses
living things.
> But the smart money is betting that there are countless alien
landscapes,
> both around our star and others, where conditions are not only
ripe for
> life, but biology has actually burst forth.
> The odds for extraterrestrial life, in other words, are reckoned
to be good.
> But when it comes to intelligent life -- life that could invent
science and
> technology -- the bookmakers hesitate. After all, the road to Homo
sapiens
> was snaky. There were myriad forks in the evolutionary road, and
not a few
> biologists have suggested that if the history of this planet had
been only
> slightly different, humans would never have made the scene.
Intelligence was
> a highly improbable accident, they say.
> The only way to thoroughly disprove this rather conservative
notion would be
> to find intelligence elsewhere. That's what SETI tries to do.
> But there's another line of research that could give us important
insights:
> we could investigate how species become intelligent. If the
process that
> drives species to higher IQ depends on contingency and
happenstance, we
> might infer that thinking is a rare talent. If not, then we can
confidently
> expect plenty of sophisticated galactic brethren.
> Regrettably, we still don't know how our own intelligence arose.
What
> prodded our ancestors to evolve from simple simians to cogitating
creatures?
> One theory says it was all a consequence of mating behavior that
selected
> for reproductive fitness, but there are other possibilities.
> As little as we know about our own intellectual history, we know
even less
> about other, clearly brainy species, such as dolphins.
> Correction: make that past tense. Some research just published by
behavioral
> biologist Lori Marino (of Emory University and the SETI Insitute),
together
> with her colleagues Dan McShea and Mark D. Uhen, has, for the
first time,
> mapped out the intelligence of toothed whales and dolphins over
the past 50
> million years. This map may lead us to some real research treasure:
> uncovering just what it is that provokes evolution to select for
high
> intelligence.
> How could Marino and her team measure the IQ's of animals that
breathed
> their last millions of years ago? She used what has become an
accepted
> standard for gauging the intelligence of animals both dead and
alive: the
> so-called 'encephalization quotient', or EQ. Simply put, this is
the mass of
> the brain, as a fraction of body weight. If you have an average-
sized brain
> for your body weight, then your EQ is one. If you have twice as
massive a
> brain as the average species your size, then your EQ is two - and
you move,
> if not to the head of the class, then at least a few rows forward.
> For example, cougars, whose body weight is comparable to yours,
have EQ's of
> one. Humans have an EQ of seven, which means that your brain is
roughly
> seven times more massive than those of these big cats (which is
why you can
> invariably beat them at Scrabble).
> Marino's team spent four years prowling the dusty collections of
museums,
> tracking down fossil crania of toothed whales and dolphins. They
then
> determined their brain volumes with the help of computer
tomography. The
> animals' weight was estimated by measuring the size of some of the
bones
> where the spinal cord enters the skull, a parameter known to be
strongly
> correlated with body mass. With data in hand, they could then
compute the
> EQ's of more than 200 specimens, representing 37 families and 62
species.
> What did they find? To begin with, cetaceans had a big jump in EQ
about 35
> million years ago, quadrupling from EQ = 0.5 to EQ = 2.1. No one
knows what
> caused this cerebral shift, but one possibility is that it was the
> consequence of developing echolocation -- "seeing" their
surroundings by
> voicing high-pitched chirps and analyzing the reflected sounds.
> However, in the last 35 million years, these creatures have
produced
> descendants with a wide range of EQ's, some quite average with
EQ's around
> 1.0, and others with EQ's of 4 and 5, rather close to our own.
Indeed, as
> Marino says, "The smarter cetaceans may not be far behind us; they
can do a
> lot of the things that only humans and great apes can do. They
might be a
> good example of a complex, but largely non-technological
intelligence."
> What does this show? We're not closely related to dolphins in an
> evolutionary sense. And yet they developed intelligence comparable
to our
> own. That suggests that there is real survival value in
intelligence, and
> that there are many ways that nature can produce it.
> "Here you have four or five different animal groups that, from an
> evolutionary standpoint, are very different," says Marino. "But
there's
> clearly a higher order selection effect that has created
similarities in
> function. It might be the consequence of some aspect of social
interaction."
> "And keep in mind," Marino points out, "brains don't all just get
bigger
> over time. You'd better have a very good reason for having a big
brain,
> because they're metabolically very expensive. You'll have the
brain that you
> need, no more."
> But for those creatures inhabiting an ecological niche where
intelligence
> pays off, it sounds as if high IQ's could be reached via many
roads.
> "Cetaceans and primates are not closely related at all, but both
have
> similar behavior capacities and large brains -- the largest on the
planet.
> Cognitive convergence seems to be the bottom line."
> So what about the likelihood of extraterrestrial intelligence?
Marino waxes
> philosophical: "I think this research is a piece of the puzzle,
although we
> still have a long way to go."
> "It does tell us something about how intelligence developed on
this planet,
> so the more we learn about that, the better we can estimate the
likelihood
> of it developing elsewhere. And it also gives us a better
understanding of
> what the range of possibilities is."
> Humans are not the only brainy game in town. And that statement
may extend
> to the cosmos.
> ###
>
>
>
> ---
> No se encontraron virus en este mensaje de Salida con el AVG.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 01/11/04





Las páginas Web relacionadas con esta lista son
http://www.molwick.com/tgecv.es/
http://www.molwick.com/memint.es/


Para cancelar su suscripción a este grupo, envíe un mensaje de correo-e a:
tgecv-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


Enlaces a Yahoo! Grupos


tgecv-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

http://es.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 01/11/2004




Sáb, 6 de Nov, 2004 6:38 pm

perezbem
Sin conexión Sin conexión
Enviar mensaje Enviar mensaje

Reenviar Mensaje #97 de 114 |
Desplegar mensajes Autor Ordenar por fecha

En inglés. Slds. Anabel ************* This article from Space.com relates to the evolution of the brain and intelligence in humans and cetaceans, within the...
Anabel
member; u=12...
Sin conexión Enviar mensaje
4 de Nov, 2004
11:35 am

Estoy totalmente de acuerdo contigo Anabel, Star Trek es impresionante en cuanto a exposición de ideas supermodernas sobre los conceptos de la vida y muchas...
jossemolina
member; u=17...
Sin conexión Enviar mensaje
6 de Nov, 2004
12:32 pm

En realidad, justamente en ST TNG (la nueva generacion) sí hablan de la evolucion en varias ocasiones, pero siempre como teoría y no como dato cierto. Esto...
Pérez-Bemporat (Ya...
member; u=12...
Sin conexión Enviar mensaje
6 de Nov, 2004
6:38 pm

Bueno, en Star Trek TNG(la nueva generacion)aparecen semidioses, seres muy superiores a la especie humana, una especie que evoluciona “a la luz”, vida...
versee2
member; u=17...
Sin conexión Enviar mensaje
6 de Nov, 2004
10:22 pm
Avanzado

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Todos los derechos reservados.
Política de Privacidad Actualizada - Condiciones del servicio - Directrices - Ayuda